Article Navigation
Article Contents
-
Abstract
-
Introduction to Goat Meat Production
-
Popularity of Goat Meat
-
Goat Carcass Characteristics
-
Goat Carcass Composition and Retail Cuts
-
Goat Meat Quality
-
Nutrient Composition
-
Cooking and Preparation of Goat Meat
-
Conclusions and Future Prospects for Goat Meat Production and Quality
-
Literature Cited
- < Previous
- Next >
Journal Article
E.C. Webb 1Department of Animal and Wildlife Sciences and Institute of Food, Nutrition, and Well-being, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria 0028, South Africa *Correspondence:Edward.webb@up.ac.za Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic
Animal Frontiers, Volume 4, Issue 4, October 2014, Pages 33–37, https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2014-0031
Published:
01 October 2014
- Split View
- Views
- Article contents
- Figures & tables
- Video
- Audio
- Supplementary Data
-
Cite
Cite
E.C. Webb, Goat meat production, composition, and quality, Animal Frontiers, Volume 4, Issue 4, October 2014, Pages 33–37, https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2014-0031
Close
Search
Close
Search
Advanced Search
Search Menu
Abstract
Goats are prolific and resilient small ruminant livestock with a wide ecological adaptation. Production and consumption of goat meat are low despite the importance of the species, but this sector has huge potential to supply food for a growing human population.
Goat meat serves as a major source of meat in developing countries while it is less popular in western countries. Nevertheless, the perceptions about goat meat are changing due to the health benefits of the consumption of lean meat with reduced fat and cholesterol content.
Scientific research has been conducted on the quality and composition of goat meat as well as management, feeding, and genetic aspects of goat meat production.
It is clear that, in future, goat production will have to focus on the use of technologies to improve productivity and efficiency.
Improved transportation, pre-slaughter management, and optimum slaughter weights and conditions are essential to ensure consistently high quality meat from goats. The purpose of this article is to review goat meat production, composition, and quality.
Introduction to Goat Meat Production
Domesticated goats descended from the bezoar or wild goat, Capra hircus, in the hills of western Asia. These small ruminants represent one of the earliest species of livestock domesticated by pastoralist humans approximately 9,000 years ago (Casey et al., 2003). Goats are now widely distributed around the world, totaling more than 850 million and representing about 1,156 different breeds (Devendra, 2010). On a global scale, goat meat consumption is less than beef (Madruga and Bressan, 2011), but goats undoubtedly serve as a staple source of red meat to humans (Webb et al., 2005), especially in developing countries. It is estimated that 98% of the goat population is in developing countries where more than 30 improved or indigenous breeds exist that are under-utilized (Devendra, 2010). In India, goat meat is preferred above mutton (Sen et al., 2004).
Commercial farming for metropolitan markets is increasing in Asia, Africa, and in Central and South America (Casey et al., 2003). In New Zealand, the focus of goat production is primarily on fiber, and meat is a by-product (Hogg et al., 1992). The exploitation of unconventional livestock like goats is advocated in developing countries to meet the increasing demands for meat consumption (Babiker et al., 1990) and to ensure food security.
The quantity and quality of goat meat are affected by genetic and environmental factors (Goetsch et al., 2011). The effects of breed, age, sex, and nutritional factors on growth, carcass, and meat quality have been reviewed (McMillin and Brock, 2005; Webb et al., 2005; Casey and Webb, 2010; Goetsch et al., 2011). Domesticated goats are characterized by notable genetic variation in morphological and production characteristics (Shrestha and Fahmy, 2005). There is a growing tendency in many countries to import more prolific breeds to increase the growth characteristics and meat yields of local goats by crossbreeding and breed improvement programs. In Italy and other countries, the demand for goat meat is seasonal with notably greater demands for the product at Christmas and Easter (Carlucci et al., 1998). Similar trends in terms of seasonal fluctuations in producer prices for goats are noticeable in the USA. The demand and producer prices of goats generally increase from November and December to Easter, followed by a decrease in demand and producer prices from July to October. Although goat meat production holds promise in terms of supplying the protein needs of an increasing human population, there are concerns about the productivity of goats in developing countries due mostly to inefficient feeding and management, inadequate exploitation of genetic resources, and disease constraints (Devendra, 2010). These concerns will be discussed the next sections.
Popularity of Goat Meat
The popularity of goat meat is subject to the common culture of communities and the forces of civilization (Webb et al., 2005). Consumers in the Western world do not favor goat meat (Babiker et al., 1990), although the perceptions of Western consumers are changing because of its low fat and cholesterol contents and favorable sensory characteristics (Webb et al., 2005; Madruga and Bressan, 2011). Globally, goat meat consumption increased during the past 20 years (Madruga and Bressan, 2011). Ibrahim (2011) recently reported an increase in the importation of chevon from Australia and New Zealand to the USA due to an increasing immigrant population. The increasing awareness of Western consumers in relation to a variety of environmental issues and traceability has caused a greater demand for animal products from organic or natural production systems, which are compatible with extensive goat production systems.
Goat Carcass Characteristics
The phenotypic characteristics and production potential of goats are highly variable, with subsequent effects on carcass and meat quality. Carcass characteristics of Boer goats, Nubian × Florida Native goats, Spanish × Florida Native goats, and Florida Native goats at representative commercial slaughter weights are presented in Table 1. Goats are generally sub-divided in three categories based on frame size, namely, dwarf breeds, small breeds, and large breeds. The body weights of goats with a small frame size vary between 15 and 30 kg at about 15 months of age, while large-framed breeds may weigh up to 55 kg body weight at a similar age. By contrast, dwarf goats seldom weigh more than 25 kg at 15 to 24 months of age. Mature animals above 2 years of age tend to dominate goat markets in developed countries and formal markets in developing countries, while appreciably younger animals are traded in the informal, subsistence, and small-scale agricultural systems.
Table 1.
Comparison of carcass charactersitics of Boer goats, Nubian × Florida Native goats, Spanish × Florida Native goats, and Florida Native goats at representative commercial slaughter weights.
Variables | Boer goats* | Nubian × Florida Native† | Spanish × Florida Native † | Florida Native† |
Cold carcass weight, kg | 14.0 | 10.9 | 9.6 | 9.5 |
Dressing, % | 55.7 | 50.0 | 51.1 | 51.9 |
Total meat, % | 76.5 | 69.0 | 68.3 | 68.0 |
Total bone, % | 20.5 | 21.7 | 21.2 | 20.4 |
Variables | Boer goats* | Nubian × Florida Native† | Spanish × Florida Native † | Florida Native† |
Cold carcass weight, kg | 14.0 | 10.9 | 9.6 | 9.5 |
Dressing, % | 55.7 | 50.0 | 51.1 | 51.9 |
Total meat, % | 76.5 | 69.0 | 68.3 | 68.0 |
Total bone, % | 20.5 | 21.7 | 21.2 | 20.4 |
* Tshabalala et al. (2003).
† Johnson et al. (1995).
Open in new tab
Table 1.
Comparison of carcass charactersitics of Boer goats, Nubian × Florida Native goats, Spanish × Florida Native goats, and Florida Native goats at representative commercial slaughter weights.
Variables | Boer goats* | Nubian × Florida Native† | Spanish × Florida Native † | Florida Native† |
Cold carcass weight, kg | 14.0 | 10.9 | 9.6 | 9.5 |
Dressing, % | 55.7 | 50.0 | 51.1 | 51.9 |
Total meat, % | 76.5 | 69.0 | 68.3 | 68.0 |
Total bone, % | 20.5 | 21.7 | 21.2 | 20.4 |
Variables | Boer goats* | Nubian × Florida Native† | Spanish × Florida Native † | Florida Native† |
Cold carcass weight, kg | 14.0 | 10.9 | 9.6 | 9.5 |
Dressing, % | 55.7 | 50.0 | 51.1 | 51.9 |
Total meat, % | 76.5 | 69.0 | 68.3 | 68.0 |
Total bone, % | 20.5 | 21.7 | 21.2 | 20.4 |
* Tshabalala et al. (2003).
† Johnson et al. (1995).
Open in new tab
Open in new tabDownload slide
ThinkStock/alexmak72427
Slaughter weights are influenced by the production system, mature frame size or type, environmental factors like the availability of feed and water, as well as cultural factors and rituals. “Cobrito meat” from relatively small carcasses of 6 to 8 kg is popular in Mediterranean countries, Latin America, and western parts of India (Madruga and Bressan, 2011). Optimum carcass weights vary between 12 and 15 kg due to the increasing emphasis on lean meat yield. Indications are that carcasses from older animals that weigh more than 20 kg are more likely to be perceived as stringy, tough, and strongly flavored (Webb et al., 2005; Casey and Webb, 2010). This is reminiscent of the practice in marginal agricultural systems to retain castrates that will survive droughts and to trade such animals at an older age.
The dressing percentage of goat carcasses tend to be less than that of sheep, mainly due to the reduced carcass fat content of goats (Webb et al., 2005). Average dressing percentages varies between 50 and 55%. An important feature of goat carcasses is that almost all parts of the carcass are consumed, which makes the practical use of dressing percentage in goats dubious (Lebbie, 2004). Carcass fat content of goats is generally low, and fat accretion occurs much later in the growth process compared with other domesticated ruminants. It should be noted that in some countries, the head is not removed from goat carcasses, which influences the dressing percentage. Values quoted in this paper are with the head removed from the carcass. In addition, moisture and drip losses from goat carcasses are sometimes quite high (up to 8%), which may result in lesser dressing percentage values.
Carcass fat content and composition are influenced by age, sex, breed type, body weight, and dietary factors (Casey et al., 2003). The relatively low carcass fat content in goats has implications on the conversion of muscle to meat and ultimately meat quality (Webb et al., 2005). In this regard, the relatively poor subcutaneous fat cover appears to be the most limiting factor since subcutaneous fat is used to estimate carcass yield in sheep and other ruminants. It follows that most sheep grading and/or classification systems that are at least partly based on subcutaneous fat thickness or cover, cannot be employed in goats (Simela et al., 2004a). Goat carcasses with less subcutaneous fat are more prone to moisture losses and cold shortening subsequent to chilling. Cold shortening in lean goat carcasses can be better managed or prevented by electrical stimulation of the carcasses as well as post-mortem ageing or blade tenderization (Kannan et al., 2002, 2006; McMillan and Brock, 2005).
Goat Carcass Composition and Retail Cuts
The use of the various cuts of a goat carcass differs among countries; for instance, the cuts from the loin region, dorsal trunk (dorsal part of the thorax), and hind limb are the most sought after ones in Western countries. By contrast, a high preference for cuts from the breast region has been shown in some African and Asian studies (Casey, 1982; Simela, 2005). These aspects have important implications in terms of the marketing of goats in different countries. Cuts from the hind limb are associated with high value due to the low carcass fat and high lean content (Casey, 1982; Simela, 2005). Cuts from the dorsal trunk have a low fat content, but they are perceived to contain a percentage of bone (Table 2). The practical implications are that the rib and loin cuts from goat carcasses are less meaty compared with similar cuts derived from the dorsal trunk of sheep.
Table 2.
Approximate mass distribution of major primal cuts in Boer goat carcasses (expressed as a percentage of carcass weight) at a representative commercial carcass weight of ca. 14 kg (adapted from Casey et al., 2003).
Boer goat | |
Fore limb, % | 17.3 |
Neck, % | 9.3 |
Ventral trunk, % | 25.8 |
Dorsal trunk, % | 19.3 |
Hind limb, % | 28.4 |
Boer goat | |
Fore limb, % | 17.3 |
Neck, % | 9.3 |
Ventral trunk, % | 25.8 |
Dorsal trunk, % | 19.3 |
Hind limb, % | 28.4 |
Open in new tab
Table 2.
Approximate mass distribution of major primal cuts in Boer goat carcasses (expressed as a percentage of carcass weight) at a representative commercial carcass weight of ca. 14 kg (adapted from Casey et al., 2003).
Boer goat | |
Fore limb, % | 17.3 |
Neck, % | 9.3 |
Ventral trunk, % | 25.8 |
Dorsal trunk, % | 19.3 |
Hind limb, % | 28.4 |
Boer goat | |
Fore limb, % | 17.3 |
Neck, % | 9.3 |
Ventral trunk, % | 25.8 |
Dorsal trunk, % | 19.3 |
Hind limb, % | 28.4 |
Open in new tab
Goat Meat Quality
Goat meat is internationally regarded as a lean red meat with favorable nutritional characteristics (Babiker et al., 1990; Hogg et al., 1992; Webb et al., 2005). Goat meat has a somewhat darker red color, coarser texture, and characteristically different flavor and aroma compared with lamb or mutton (Schönfeldt et al., 1993a,b; Casey et al., 2003). The results of sensory studies indicate that goat meat is different but certainly not inferior to lamb (Webb et al., 2005). Goat meat and meat products also tend to be less juicy than mutton (Schönfeldt et al., 1993b; Tshabalala et al., 2003) predominantly due to their reduced fat content.
Flavor and aroma are complex attributes of goat meat. These sensory attributes are affected by species, age, fatness, and anatomical location, gender, diet, and method of cooking. Consumers can easily detect the aroma and flavor of meat and can grade the acceptability of these attributes. Goat meat flavor is either as acceptable (Babiker et al., 1990; Griffin et al., 1992) or less desirable (Pike et al., 1973a) than that of lamb or mutton.
Branched chain fatty acids may contribute to the typical sheep and goat species flavor (Wong et al., 1975; Johnson et al., 1977; Ha and Lindsay, 1990). The strong goat odor has been associated with 4-ethyloctanoic acid in goat meat, lamb, and mutton (Brennand, 1989 as cited by Madruga et al., 2000; Ha and Lindsay, 1990). Shear force values and tenderness ratings of goat meat are generally acceptable, especially meat from young animals (Webb et al., 2005). Factors such as the treatment of the animals before slaughter (Simela et al., 2004a, b) and of the carcass (like electrical stimulation of carcasses with high or low voltages) influence meat tenderness (King et al., 2004).
One of the important recent contributions to our current knowledge on goat meat quality concerns the sensitivity of goats to peri-mortem stress and the related effects on the conversion of muscle to meat (Webb et al., 2005). Ultimate pH values (pHu) in goat carcasses generally range between 5.8 and 6.2 (Nuñez Gonzalez et al., 1983; Kannan et al., 2001, 2003; Simela et al., 2004a,b). These high-pHu values of goat meat suggest that goats are generally more prone to stress. Peri-mortem concentrations of glycolytic metabolites in muscles support these findings (Simela et al., 2004b). A glycogen concentration of approximately 50 µmol/g is regarded as the minimum concentration required for sufficient lactic acid production to attain a satisfactory pHu. Simela et al. (2004b) reported muscle glycogen concentration as low as 33 µmol/g for samples from a goat herd of mixed sex and age.
Goat carcasses with a lower pHu tend to be more tender, with lower shear force values and better colorimetric values (Simela et al., 2004a) than those with a high pHu. The susceptibility of goats to peri-mortem stress is apparently associated with the excitable nature of goats, which predisposes them to this condition (Hopkins and Fogarty, 1998). Much of the variation in meat quality due to peri-mortem stress appears to be associated with transportation stress, and it was shown in Omani goats that electrical stimulation of carcasses reduces the effects of transportation stress (Kadim et al., 2010) by increasing the anaerobic metabolism of glucose to lactic acid, reducing cold shortening and improving the conversion of muscle to meat.
Open in new tabDownload slide
ThinkStock/Johny87
Nutrient Composition
A summary of the proximate composition of goat meat is presented in Table 3. Goat meat protein also has a high biological value of approximately 60.4 and digestibility coefficient of 97% based on trials with rats fed a 10% protein level from goat meat (Casey et al., 2003).
Table 3.
Summary of proximate composition of goat meat from meat type (Boer goat), unimproved indigenous goats (Savanna goat), and hair-type goats (Angora goat; adapted from Webb et al., 2005).
Nutrient | Moisture | Protein | Fat | Ash |
% | ||||
Boer goat | 69.4 | 22.8 | 10.5 | 0.95 |
Savanna goat | 69.8 | 24.3 | 7.9 | 0.97 |
Angora goat | 64.2 | 29.1 | 4.4 | 1.0 |
Nutrient | Moisture | Protein | Fat | Ash |
% | ||||
Boer goat | 69.4 | 22.8 | 10.5 | 0.95 |
Savanna goat | 69.8 | 24.3 | 7.9 | 0.97 |
Angora goat | 64.2 | 29.1 | 4.4 | 1.0 |
Open in new tab
Table 3.
Summary of proximate composition of goat meat from meat type (Boer goat), unimproved indigenous goats (Savanna goat), and hair-type goats (Angora goat; adapted from Webb et al., 2005).
Nutrient | Moisture | Protein | Fat | Ash |
% | ||||
Boer goat | 69.4 | 22.8 | 10.5 | 0.95 |
Savanna goat | 69.8 | 24.3 | 7.9 | 0.97 |
Angora goat | 64.2 | 29.1 | 4.4 | 1.0 |
Nutrient | Moisture | Protein | Fat | Ash |
% | ||||
Boer goat | 69.4 | 22.8 | 10.5 | 0.95 |
Savanna goat | 69.8 | 24.3 | 7.9 | 0.97 |
Angora goat | 64.2 | 29.1 | 4.4 | 1.0 |
Open in new tab
Goat meat provides an acceptable source of protein and essential amino acids to meet the dietary requirements of the average adult consumers. The amino acid composition varies little between species on a lean meat basis, while the differences are more significant on a whole-meat basis. Goat meat also provides an excellent source of iron because the haeme iron is about 5 to 10% more available than non-haem iron (Casey et al., 2003).
In terms of fat, both the chemical and physical properties of fat influence the sensory and keeping properties of meat (Webb et al., 2005; Webb and O'Neill, 2008). The degree of saturation of fat [ratio between saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acids] influences the consistency, chemical composition, and sensory characteristics of carcass fats and the shelf life of meat products. Desirable fatty acids are also important and include C18:0 and all unsaturated fatty acids (Banskalieva et al., 2000) because they have no adverse implications on consumer health. The PUFA/SFA ratio should be high and be at least 0.45 (Enser et al., 1998). Within PUFA, a high proportion of n-3 fatty acids is beneficial while the ratio of n-6/n-3 of less than 5 is acceptable (Raes et al., 2004).
Chevon has an advantageous fatty acid profile, and the meat is ideal for health-conscious consumers (Hogg et al., 1992; Mahgoub et al., 2002). Desirable fatty acids in chevon ranged between 61 and 80% (Banskalieva et al., 2000), while figures were 67.45% for Omani goats (Mahgoub et al., 2002) and 65.37 and 66.4% for Boer and South African indigenous goats, respectively (Tshabalala et al., 2003). The PUFA/SFA ratios of chevon are often greater than similar values for lamb/mutton, beef, and pork. Although grain feeding improves the ratio of PUFA/SFA, it also increases the n-6/n-3 ratio to an unfavorable level (Enser et al., 1998). The cholesterol content of goat meat generally varies between 30 and 60 mg/100 g (Werdi Pratiwi et al., 2006).
Cooking and Preparation of Goat Meat
The effect of cooking on muscle is method-, time-, and temperature-dependent, and the response to heat treatment varies between muscles and according to pre- and post-mortem influences. Cooking could be either direct (in a pan or over an open fire or heated coals) or indirect (in a pot with or without moisture). Prolonged indirect cooking appears to be the standard method of preparation in African countries while the cooking methods in other countries are comparable with that employed for mutton or lamb (including both direct and indirect cooking methods). Prolonged cooking leads to rendering in which a very high percentage of fat cookout is obtained.
Generally, temperatures below 100°C affect palatability, without severely reducing the nutritive value of the meat (Casey et al., 2003). Cooking losses from goat meat tend to be high (35%), and this detracts from the sensation of juiciness. Cooking losses contributed at least in part to the perception of consumers that goat meat is less juicy than lamb or mutton (Schönfeldt et al., 1993b; Tshabalala et al., 2003). Goat meat from different breeds can be used to manufacture processed products of acceptable sensory quality (Breukink and Casey, 1989; Tshabalala et al., 2003).
Conclusions and Future Prospects for Goat Meat Production and Quality
Goats are adaptable and resilient ruminants that provide an invaluable resource to ensure sustainable livestock production and contribute to the mounting protein needs of a rapidly growing human population. Goat meat is widely regarded as lean meat, and indications are that the demand for this healthy meat will increase. Goat producers will have to employ new technologies and feeding methods to improve the productivity and yields of goats, especially the improved or indigenous breeds of goats. Better management and feeding of goats are essential to improve carcass composition and reduce the risk of cold shortening and moisture losses post-mortem. The use of electrical stimulation of carcasses appears to be essential to manage the effects of transportation and peri-mortem stress in goats. Marketing goat meat as a lean and healthy product should be a major future initiative to improve the acceptance of goat meat as alternative source of good quality protein from animal origin.
Edward Webb is Professor and Head of the Department of Animal and Wildlife Sciences in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences at the University of Pretoria, South Africa. He is a graduate of the University of Pretoria and conducted postdoctoral research at the University of Ghent in Belgium and Nutreco in the Netherlands on aspects of growth modeling and the effects of nutrition on fatty acid synthesis in livestock. His outstanding academic achievements include a number of merit awards, graduate and merit bursaries, National Research Foundation merit awards, AM Bosman gold medal, a South African Society for Animal Science (SASAS) merit award, and a SASAS award for an outstanding Ph.D. thesis. Professor Webb's teaching and research focus on the effects of dietary factors, growth, and growth modifiers on growth, efficiency, and meat quality of livestock. He has published and presented more than 70 peer-reviewed scientific papers, presented 85 papers at conferences or symposia, written 25 technical reports, and co-edited 2 books, 7 chapters in books, and 23 popular scientific papers. He is president (ex-officio) of SASAS and is a registered professional animal scientist.
Literature Cited
Alexandre G. Mandonnet N.
2005
.
Goat meat production in harsh environments
.
Small Rumin. Res.
60
:
53
–
66
.
Babiker S.A. El Khider I.A. Shafie S.A.
1990
.
Chemical composition and quality attributes of goat meat and lamb
.
Meat Sci.
28
:
273
–
277
.
Banskalieva V. Sahlu T. Goetsch A.L.
2000
.
Fatty acid composition of goat muscle fat depots: A review
.
Small Rumin. Res.
37
:
255
–
268
.
Breukink H.R. Casey N.H.
1989
.
Assessing the acceptability of processed goat meat
.
S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci.
19
:
76
–
80
.
OpenURL Placeholder Text
Carlucci A. Girolami A. Napolitano F. Monteleone E.
1998
.
Sensory evaluation of young goat meat
.
Meat Sci.
50
(
1
):
131
–
136
.
Casey N.H.
1982
.
Carcass and growth characteristics of four South African sheep breed and the Boer goat
.
Ph.D. thesis, University of Pretoria
.
Casey N.H. Van Niekerk W.A. Webb E.C.
2003
.
Goats meat
. In: Caballero B. Trugo L. Finglass P.
Encyclopedia of food sciences and nutrition.
Academic Press
,
London
. p.
2937
–
2944
.
Casey N.H. Webb E.C.
2010
.
Managing goat production for meat quality
.
Small Rumin. Res.
89
:
218
–
244
.
Devendra C.
2010
.
Concluding synthesis and the future forsustainable goat production
.
Small Rumin. Res.
89
:
125
–
130
.
Enser M. Hallett K.G. Hewett B. Fursey G.A.J. Wood J.D. Harrington G.
1998
.
Fatty acid content and composition of UK beef and lamb muscle in relation to production system and implications for human nutrition
.
Meat Sci.
49
:
329
–
341
.
Griffin C.L. Orcutt M.W. Riley R.R. Smith G.C. Savell J.W. Shelton M.
1992
.
Evaluation of the palatability of lamb, mutton and chevon by sensory panels of various cultural backgrounds
.
Small Rumin. Res.
8
:
67
–
74
.
Goetsch A.L. Merkel R.C. Gipson T.A.
2011
.
Factors affecting goat meat production and quality
.
Small Rumin. Res.
101
:
173
–
181
.
Ha J.K. Lindsay R.C.
1990
.
Distribution of volatile branched-chain fatty acids in perinephric fats of various red meat species
.
Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie
23
:
433
–
440
.
OpenURL Placeholder Text
Hogg B.W. Mercer G.J.K. Mortimer B.J. Kirton A.H. Duganzich D.M.
1992
.
Carcass and meat quality attributes of commercial goats in New Zealand
.
Small Rumin. Res.
8
:
243
–
256
.
Hopkins D.L. Fogarty N.M.
1998
.
Diverse lamb genotypes 2: Meat pH, colour and tenderness
.
Meat Sci.
49
:
477
–
488
.
Ibrahim M.
2011
.
Consumer willingness to pay a premium for Halal gaot meat: A case from Atlanta, Georgia
.
J. Food Distribution Res.
42
(
1
):
72
–
76
.
OpenURL Placeholder Text
Johnson C.B. Wong E. Birch E.J.
1977
.
Analysis of 4-methyloctanoic acid and other medium chain-length fatty acid constituents of ovine tissue lipids
.
Lipids
12
:
340
–
347
.
Johnson D.D. McGowan C.H. Nurse G. Anous M.R.
1995
.
Breed type effects on carcass traits, composition and tenderness of young goats
.
Small Rumin. Res.
17
:
57
–
63
.
Kadim I.T. Mahgoub O. Al-Marzooqi W. Khalaf S. Al-Sinawi S.H. Al-Amri I.
2010
.
Effects of transportation during the hotseason, breed and electrical stimulation on histochemical and meat quality characteristics of goat longissimus muscle
.
Anim. Sci. J.
81
:
352
–
361
.
Kannan G. Gadiyaram K.M. Galipalli S. Carmichael A. Kouakou B. Pringle T.D. McMillin K.W. Gelaye S.
2006
.
Meat quality in goats as influenced by dietary protein and energy levels, and post-mortem ageing
.
Small Rumin. Res.
61
:
45
–
52
.
Kannan G. Kouakou B. Terrill T.H. Gelaye S. Amoah E.A.
2003
.
Endocrine, blood metabolite, and meat quality changes in goats as influenced by short term pre-slaughter stress
.
J. Anim. Sci.
81
:
1499
–
1507
.
Kannan G. Terrill T.H. Kouakou B. Gelaye S. Amoah E.A.
2002
.
Simulated pre-slaughter holding and isolation effects on stress responses and live weight shrinkage in meat goats
.
J. Anim. Sci.
80
:
1771
–
1780
.
King D.A. Voges K.L. Hale D.S. Waldron D.F. Taylor C.A. Savell J.W.
2004
.
High voltage electrical stimulation enhances muscle tenderness, increases aging response, and improves muscle color from cabrito carcasses
.
Meat Sci.
68
:
529
–
535
.
Lebbie S.H.B.
2004
.
Goats under household conditions
.
Small Rumin. Res.
51
:
131
–
136
.
Madruga M.S. Bressan M.C.
2011
.
Goat meats: Description, rational use, certification, processing and technical developments
.
Small Rumin. Res.
98
:
39
–
45
.
Madruga M.S. Arruda S.G.B. Narain N. Souza J.G.
2000
.
Castration and slaughter age effects on panel assessment and aroma compounds of the ‘mestiço’ goat meat
.
Meat Sci.
56
:
117
–
125
.
Madruga M.S. Arruda S.G.B. Nascimento J.A.
1999
.
Castration and slaughter age effects on nutritive value of the ‘mestiço’ goat meat
.
Meat Sci.
52
:
119
–
125
.
Mahgoub O. Khan A.J. Al-Maqbaly R.S. Al-Sabahi J.N. Annamalai K. Al-Sakry N.M.
2002
.
Fatty acid composition of muscle and fat tissues of Omani Jebel Akhdar goats of different sexes and weights
.
Meat Sci.
61
:
381
–
387
.
Mahgoub O. Lu C.D.
1998
.
Growth, body composition and carcass tissue distribution in goats of large and small sizes
.
Small Rumin. Res.
27
:
267
–
278
.
McMillin K.W. Brock A.P.
2005
.
Production practices and processing for value-added goat meat, J
.
Ani. Sci.
83
:(
E-suppl
.)
E57
–
E68
.
OpenURL Placeholder Text
Nuñez Gonzalez F.A. Owen J.E. Arias Cereceres M.T.
1983
.
Studies on the Criollo goat of northern Mexico: Part 2. Physical and chemical characteristics of the musculature
.
Meat Sci.
9
:
305
–
314
.
Pike M.I. Smith G.C. Carpenter Z.L.
1973a
.
Palatability ratings for meat from goats and other meat animal species
.
J. Anim. Sci.
37
:
269
(
abstract 159
).
OpenURL Placeholder Text
Pike M.I. Smith G.C. Carpenter Z.L. Shelton M.
1973b
.
Effects of maturity and fatness on the palatability of goat meat
.
J. Anim. Sci.
37
:
269
(
abstract 158
).
OpenURL Placeholder Text
Raes K. De Smet S. Demeyer D.
2004
.
Effect of dietary fatty acids on incorporation of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid in lamb, beef and pork meat: A review
.
Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.
113
:
199
–
221
.
Schönfeldt H.C. Naude R.T. Bok W. van Heerden S.M. Smit R. Boshoff E.
1993a
.
Flavour and tenderness related quality characteristics of goat and sheep meat
.
Meat Sci.
34
:
363
–
379
.
Schönfeldt H.C. Naude R.T. Bok W. van Heerden S.M. Swoden L. Boshoff E.
1993b
.
Cooking and juiciness related quality characteristics of goat and sheep meat
.
Meat Sci.
34
:
381
–
394
.
Sen A.R. Santra A. Karim S.A.
2004
.
Carcass yield, composition and meat quality attributes of sheep and goat under semiarid conditions
.
Meat Sci.
66
:
757
–
763
.
Shrestha J.N.B. Fahmy M.H.
2005
.
Breeding goats for meat production: A review 1. Genetic resources, management and breed evaluation
.
Small Rumin. Res.
58
:
93
–
106
.
Simela L.
2005
.
Meat characteristics and acceptability of chevon from South African indigenous goats
,
PhD thesis, University of Pretoria
,
Pretoria, South Africa
.
Simela L. Webb E.C. Frylinck L.
2004a
.
Effect of sex, age and pre-slaughter conditioning on pH, temperature, tenderness and colour of indigenous South African goats
.
S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci.
24
(
1
):
208
–
211
.
OpenURL Placeholder Text
Simela L. Webb E.C. Frylinck L.
2004b
.
Post-mortem metabolic status, pH and temperature of chevon from indigenous South African goats slaughtered under commercial conditions
.
S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci.
24
(
1
):
204
–
207
.
OpenURL Placeholder Text
Smith G.C. Carpenter Z.L. Shelton M.
1978
.
Effects of age and quality level on the palatability of goat meat
.
J. Anim. Sci.
46
:
1229
–
1235
.
Tshabalala P.A. Strydom P.E. Webb E.C. De Kock H.L.
2003
.
Meat quality of designated South African indigenous goat and sheep breeds
.
Meat Sci.
65
(
1
):
563
–
570
.
Van Niekerk W.A. Casey N.H.
1988
.
The Boer goat. II. Growth, nutrient requirements, carcass and meat quality
.
Small Rumin. Res.
1
:
355
–
368
.
Webb E.C. Casey N.H. Simela L.
2005
.
Goat meat quality
.
Small Rumin. Res.
60
:
153
–
166
.
Webb E.C. O'Neill H.A.
2008
.
The animal fat paradox
.
Meat Sci.
80
:
28
–
36
.
Werdi Pratiwi N.M. Murray P.J. Taylor D.G.
2006
.
Total cholesterol concentrations of the muscles in castrated Boer goats
.
Small Rumin. Res.
64
:
77
–
81
.
Wong E. Nixon L.N. Johnson C.B.
1975
.
Volatile medium chain fatty acids and mutton flavour
.
J. Agric. and Food Sci.
23
:
495
–
498
.
© 2014 Webb
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Issue Section:
Feature Articles
Download all slides
Advertisem*nt
Citations
Views
21,629
Altmetric
More metrics information
Metrics
Total Views 21,629
18,905 Pageviews
2,724 PDF Downloads
Since 1/1/2018
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
January 2018 | 18 |
February 2018 | 19 |
March 2018 | 21 |
April 2018 | 68 |
May 2018 | 88 |
June 2018 | 73 |
July 2018 | 52 |
August 2018 | 65 |
September 2018 | 67 |
October 2018 | 70 |
November 2018 | 76 |
December 2018 | 86 |
January 2019 | 180 |
February 2019 | 178 |
March 2019 | 287 |
April 2019 | 305 |
May 2019 | 273 |
June 2019 | 312 |
July 2019 | 319 |
August 2019 | 330 |
September 2019 | 295 |
October 2019 | 351 |
November 2019 | 387 |
December 2019 | 332 |
January 2020 | 354 |
February 2020 | 420 |
March 2020 | 327 |
April 2020 | 257 |
May 2020 | 257 |
June 2020 | 380 |
July 2020 | 391 |
August 2020 | 381 |
September 2020 | 340 |
October 2020 | 416 |
November 2020 | 370 |
December 2020 | 392 |
January 2021 | 355 |
February 2021 | 365 |
March 2021 | 410 |
April 2021 | 465 |
May 2021 | 454 |
June 2021 | 435 |
July 2021 | 535 |
August 2021 | 351 |
September 2021 | 349 |
October 2021 | 584 |
November 2021 | 488 |
December 2021 | 411 |
January 2022 | 439 |
February 2022 | 402 |
March 2022 | 389 |
April 2022 | 387 |
May 2022 | 381 |
June 2022 | 389 |
July 2022 | 348 |
August 2022 | 286 |
September 2022 | 345 |
October 2022 | 330 |
November 2022 | 311 |
December 2022 | 255 |
January 2023 | 479 |
February 2023 | 311 |
March 2023 | 276 |
April 2023 | 298 |
May 2023 | 246 |
June 2023 | 292 |
July 2023 | 180 |
August 2023 | 184 |
September 2023 | 177 |
October 2023 | 232 |
November 2023 | 230 |
December 2023 | 228 |
January 2024 | 243 |
February 2024 | 228 |
March 2024 | 24 |
Citations
Powered by Dimensions
Altmetrics
Email alerts
Article activity alert
New issue alert
Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic
Citing articles via
Google Scholar
-
Latest
-
Most Read
-
Most Cited
More from Oxford Academic
Biological Sciences
Science and Mathematics
Books
Journals
Advertisem*nt